• Users Online: 337
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 31-38

Normal range values of ocular axial length in adult Sudanese population


Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan

Date of Web Publication17-Dec-2015

Correspondence Address:
Mahgoub Saleem
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum
Sudan
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1858-6538.172098

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: The axial length is one of the essential ocular biometric parameters which is to be done prior to any cataract surgery based on ultrasound. These ocular axial length (OAL) values can be influenced by sex, age, race, ethnicity, genetics, and refractive errors.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the normal ranges values of OAL in adult Sudanese population and to define the effects of age, gender, and tribal ethnicity on axial length.
Materials and Methods: This is descriptive multi-center hospital-based study, carried out over a period of 6 months from January 2015 to June 2015. The study takes place in five study areas: Three in Khartoum and two in Omdorman. These centers are Khartoum Eye Hospital, Makkah Eye Complex, Alwalidain Eye Hospital, and Omdurman Military Hospital and Sudan Eye Center. The study population was recruited from patients presenting to the mentioned five Hospitals Biometric Departments or volunteers who accepted to be enrolled in the study. One thousand Sudanese adults participants (n = 1000), 507 female and 493 male, with ages ranging from 18 to 105 years were included. Patients with vitreoretinal diseases, intraocular surgery, recent trauma and staphyloma were excluded. All participants underwent systematic OAL measurements by A-scan ultrasonography. Effect of age, gender, and tribal ethnicity on OAL was analyzed.
Results: The study showed that the average axial length was 23.09 mm ranging from 18.13 mm to 29.09 mm. It was longer in males (average 23.29), ranging from 20.31 mm to 28.48 mm and shorter in females (average 22.81), ranging from 18.31 mm to 29.09 mm. In the four main Sudanese tribes, the Nubian group had the longest axial length (23.23 mm), followed by the African group (23.15 mm), and then the Arab group (23.09 mm). Bejja group had the shortest axial length (22.85 mm).
Conclusion: OAL in Sudanese adults was within the international standard but with a wider range (18.13–29.09 mm). Males' OAL was longer than the OAL of females. No significant age OAL variations, but the tribal ethnicity factor was clear, so tribal ethnicity had a major influence on Sudanese OAL.

Keywords: Bijja, cataract, Nubian group, ocular axial length, ocular biometry, staphyloma, tribal ethnicity


How to cite this article:
Albashir SI, Saleem M. Normal range values of ocular axial length in adult Sudanese population. Albasar Int J Ophthalmol 2015;3:31-8

How to cite this URL:
Albashir SI, Saleem M. Normal range values of ocular axial length in adult Sudanese population. Albasar Int J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Feb 17];3:31-8. Available from: http://www.bijojournal.org/text.asp?2015/3/2/31/172098


  Introduction Top


Cataract surgery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the world,[1],[2],[3] especially on aging individuals, boasting an extremely high success rate. Modern cataract surgery has become a refractive process with very high patient postoperative expectations,[4] so accurate preoperative ocular biometric assessments are the crucially significant issues for successful cataract surgery (Royal College of Ophthalmologists Cataract Surgery Guidelines, September 2010).

Ocular axial length (OAL) is one of the major variable basic ocular biometric parameters.[5] It is defined as the distance from the posterior corneal surface to an interference peak corresponding to retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch's membrane.[6],[7] OAL has great impact on successful cataract surgery [8],[9] and refractive corrective procedures,[10] besides its diagnostic role of many ophthalmic conditions.[11]

Error in OAL measurements is the most significant error in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation,[12] which can affect the surgery outcome and patient's expectations. Ocular biometric parameters, in practically OAL, can be influenced by race, ethnicity, and genetics,[13] age, sex, and height [14] across different populations. Although there is no clear environmental or socioeconomically factors on change in OAL,[10] however, Wong and his colleagues (Chinese Tanjong Pagar Survey, 2002) demonstrated an indirect role of education, socioeconomic status due to increase close work and reading, in elongation of OAL due to myopic shift.[15]

There are close relationships between OAL and some other biometric values like central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal refractive power, axial length of myopia,[16] intraocular pressure (IOP) and susceptibility to glaucoma.[17]

There is a positive correlation between OAL and ACD; in younger people where there is longer OAL, the ACD tends to be deeper. But in older people the ACD is found to be shallower and OAL is shorter OAL. Contrarily, there is an inverse correlation between OAL and the corneal power, age, and lens thickness, so the OAL is found to be shorter (shorter eyes) with thick lenses in older patients.[18]

Also OAL plays an important role in refractive status in different age groups as both they have shared genetic loci,[19] so as refractive errors are not uncommon in communities, and Sudan is not an exceptional; we need to plot Sudanese OAL's Map to direct our optical techno needs and business.

The mean adult values for OAL are 22–25 mm,[10] which remain almost unaltered before the age of 40, then started to have slight but steady change towards hyperopia (shorter eye), after the 40 s.[20]

In spite of the vast improvement in ophthalmic technology to invent error-free electronic biometric machines, still there are minor errors in OAL assessments [21] that occur due to variations in optical refraction [10] (hyperopic shift after the age of 40) and refractive index in different ocular media with age.[22],[23] IOL master partial coherence interferometry biometer is one of the most accurate machines;[24] it was proved that it may yielded an OAL measuring error between −0.043 mm and +0.089 mm. Although these errors are quite small, but it may affect the IOL power calculation; 0.1 mm of OAL error corresponds to error in the power of the IOL around 0.25 D, these errors are expected to be higher for very high OAL values.[25]

Although A-Scan, regular ultrasound, and IOL master are the popular machines for OAL measurements, OAL can also be measured by magnetic resonance imaging, which almost matches reliably with A-scan ultrasonography.[26]


  Materials and Methods Top


This is descriptive multi-center hospital-based study, carried out over a period of 6 months from January 2015 to June 2015. The study takes place in five study areas: Three in Khartoum and two in Omdorman (Sudan). These centers are Khartoum Eye Hospital, Makkah Eye Complex, Alwalidain Eye Hospital, Omdurman Military Hospital and Sudan Eye center. The study population was recruited from patients presenting to the mentioned five Hospitals Biometric Departments or volunteers who accepted to be enrolled in the study.

One thousand Sudanese adults Sudanese participants (n = 1000), 507 female and 493 male [Figure 1], with age ranging from 18 to 105 years were studied, from January to June 2015. Simple random sampling technique was adopted. Patients with vitreoretinal diseases, intraocular surgery, recent trauma and staphyloma were excluded. All participants underwent routine ophthalmic examination and systematic OAL measurements by A-scan ultrasonography. The effect of age, gender, and tribal ethnicity on OAL was analyzed.
Figure 1: Study population genders

Click here to view


The study subjects were classified into different ethnic and racial groups according to our modified.[27] “Current Sudan Tribal composition;”[28] and “Sir Harold MacMichael (1922)[29] Sudan tribal classification in his History of the Sudan and some account of the people who proceeded them and the inhabiting Darfur."

The whole study individuals were grouped in five groups and other subgroups; as follows:[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37]

The Arab origin groups

  • Ga'alin Groups: (Gaalin, Shaygia, Rubatab, Mirafab, Batahin, Bedayria, Gumoyia, Gemie, Geme'aab)
  • Guhayna Groups: (Kawahla, Kinaniah, Salahalbia, Gaafrah, Arakia, Halaween, Shokriah, Kababeesh, Jabriah, Misayriah, Gowamaha, Hasaniah, Taaysha)
  • Others: (Ashraf, Rikabia, Masalamya, Rashaida, Konooz, Hamran, Hawawer, Kenana, Magharba).


The African origin groups

  • The non-Arab races of Darfur:[29] (Fur, Bedayat, Kura'an, Zaghawa, Tama, Mido, Berti, Tungur, Dagu, Begu, Burghad, Mima, Mararit, Fallata, Masaleet, Erenga, Mun, Hadahid, Fertit, Tungur, Omba-Raru)
  • Nubian tribes in Southern Kordufan
  • Mapan tribes in Southern Blue Nile
  • Angassana tribes in Southern Blue Nile
  • Southern Nilotic tribes
  • Western African group: (Hawsah, Brgaw, Falata, Barnu).


The Nubian groups in the far North

Danagla, Mahas, Halfaween.

The Bejja groups

Hadandawa, A'Marar, Beshare'een, Bane-Amir, Halnga.

Others (immigrants)

Coptic, Mawaleeds, Ethiopians, Somalia's, Greece, etc.,

A modified “WHO world standard population distribution; age-structure for 10-year age groups (instead of 5-years)” was adopted [38] to design seven age groups: (1) 18–20 years, (2) 21–30 years, (3) 31–40 years, (4) 41–50 years, (5) 51–60 years, (6) 61–70 years, (7) the last age group was above 70 years [Table 1] and [Figure 2].
Table 1: Age group frequency and percentage

Click here to view
Figure 2: Distribution of patients according to age age-structure groups

Click here to view


Data was analyzed by IBM SPSS Inc. (IBM SPSS Statistics) Software Group's Business Analytics Portfolio. The study was approved by Makkah Research Center ethics committee (MRCEC). Official letters were sent to the five hospitals administrations where the study was done. All participants were treated in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and verbally to each patient.


  Results Top


In total, 1000 (n = 1000) Sudanese adults with diverse tribal origins were examined during this study. Both sexes were almost equal, with slight insignificant predominance of females. Out of the total, females were 507 individuals (n = 507; 50.7%) whereas males were 493 (n = 493; 49.3%) [Figure 1]. The mean age of the study group was 62.86 ± 22.86 years (range: 18–107 years). The numbers of subjects in the different seven age-structure groups resulted in 20 subjects (n = 20; 2%) in the age group below 20 years (18–20 years), 33(n = 33; 3.3%) in the age group (21–30) years, 22 (n = 22; 2.2%) in the age group (31–40) years, 91 (n = 91; 9.1%) in the age group (41–50) years, 246 (n = 246; 24.6%) in the age group (51–60) years, 361, as the majority (n = 361; 36.1%) in the age group (61–70) years, the last age group comprising 227 subjects (n = 227; 22.7%) in the age group above 70 years. These results comprised only 16.1% of the study groups were below the 5th decade while 83.4% were above the 5th decade of age, which appears the majority of older population [Table 1] and [Figure 2].

The tribal distribution scale had shown that the Arab origin groups represented the majority of the study population of 716 subjects (n = 716; 71.6%) whereas the African origin groups represented only 152 subjects (n = 152; 15.2%).

The Arab origin groups which encompass three sub-groups: The Ga'alin Groups represent 307 subjects (n = 307; 31.4%), Guhayna groups represent 367 subjects (n = 367; 37.8%) forming the majority of population within the Arab origin groups. The remaining other Arab origin groups collectively represent 42 subjects (n = 42; 4.1%).

The African origin groups constituting the minority of the whole study population as compared with the Arab origin groups; only 152 subjects (n = 152; 15.2%). Distributed as follows: 58 (n = 58; 5.8%) to non-Arab races of Darfur, 40 (n = 40; 4.0%) to Nubian tribes in Southern Kordufan; and 54 (5.4%) to Western African groups.

The Nubian groups in the far North represented 100 (n = 100; 10%). While the Bejja tribes in the Eastern Sudan represented only 15 subjects (n = 15; 1.5%) [Figure 3]. No study subject presented the fifth Sudanese minorities: Coptic, Mawaleeds, Somalia's, Greece.
Figure 3: Male-female ocular axial length

Click here to view


Ocular axial length

The overall average of the OAL in the studied adult Sudanese population was computed to be 23.09 mm, ranging from 18.13 to 29.09 mm.

Altogether, Arab origin groups mean value of the OAL was 23.09 mm (males 23.37 mm and females 22.81 mm). Ga'alin group OAL was found to be 23.13 mm (males 23.51 mm and females 22.78 mm), that of Guhayna groups was 23.00 mm (males 23.27 mm and females 22.90 mm), and that of other Arab groups was 23.16 mm (males 23.34 mm and females 22.75 mm) [Table 2].
Table 2: Average ocular axial length in both sexes of all Sudanese different tribes

Click here to view


The African origin groups OAL was found to be 23.15 mm (males 23.28 mm and females 22.67 mm), while the non-Arab races of Darfur was averaging OAL of 23.26 mm (males 23.28 mm and females 22.47 mm). The Nubian tribes in Southern Kordufan OAL was 22.92 mm (males 23.21 mm and females 22.55 mm) and that of Western African group being the longest OAL, was 23.29 mm (males 23.35 mm and females 23.01 mm) [Table 2].

No individuals were found from Mapan, Angassana, and Southern Nilotic from the division of “The African origin groups”.

The average OAL of the Nubian groups in the far North Sudan was 23.23 mm (males 23.49 mm and females 22.68 mm) [Table 1]. While the Bejja tribes average OAL was 22.85 mm being the shortest (males 23.10 mm and females 22.66 mm) [Table 2], Figure 4] and [Figure 5].
Figure 4: Average ocular axial length in of all Sudanese different tribes

Click here to view
Figure 5: Average ocular axial length in of all Sudanese different sub-tribes

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Background

Racial differences in population regarding “Refractive Errors”, a survey which was done by late Duke-Elder (1949), who pointed that myopia which always represented biometrically by longer OAL, are common among Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, Egyptian, and Arabs. While he noted that Nubians and Sudanese are free from myopia, while most of the other Africans are more prone to hyperopia which indicative of shorter OAL.[39]

OAL found to be 16–18 mm at birth.[10],[40] It enlarges to 20 mm by the end of 12 months with continuous rapid growth until 2 years age, then increases to 23 mm between the age of 3 years to adolescence, then slowly increases to 24 mm by adulthood till 24 years of age to be stable and remains fixed in the range of 24.00–25 mm in normal adult people, as reported by Goldschmidt (1992, cited by Bhardwaj and Rajeshbhai, in reference no. 1).[10] However, Lim et al. (1992, cited by Obgeide and Omoti, in reference no. 15) reported that OAL remains practically unaltered in adult normal population till the fifth decade where it declines due to the start of the dramatic eye-aging processes.[41]

Some physiological basic studies demonstrate too small (15–40 μm; micron) diurnal axial length fluctuations in some vertebrates and human eyes with the maximum OAL at mid-day.[42] This is thought to be as part of numerous daily normal ocular physiological, noncircadian rhythms, which include variations in visual sensitivity, melatonin production, photoreceptor disc shedding,[43] IOP,[44] pupil size [45] and corneal epithelial thickness diurnal rhythms.[46],[47]

In the current study, the average OAL of Sudanese adults was found to be 23.09 mm, which was longer by 0.49 mm (2.12%) than that of Nangia et al. in the adult population of central rural India (2010),[48] where they recorded a mean OAL of 22.6 ± 0.91 mm (range, 18.22–34.20 mm). The difference between our lowest OAL and the upper one was 10.96 mm whereas the Indian one showing a difference of 15.98 mm. Both studies showed high range difference, more than 10 mm in the current study and more than 15 mm in the Indian one.

On the other hand, the Sudanese OAL was smaller by 0.05 mm (0.217%) than that of the adult Iranian (Shahroud, 2012) study of Hashemi et al.[13] whom they recorded an OAL of 23.14 mm (ranging from 23.11 to 23.17 mm) in a larger study population of 4869 subjects. The difference between their lowest length and the upper one was only 0.06 mm which showed very low range difference which is far less than ours and that of the central rural India study (Nangia et al.; 2010):10.96–15.98 mm difference.

In all the above two results (the current and the central rural Indian studies [48]), there were large variations in the OAL; the possible explanation was that: The most affecting causes could be the diverse age [Figure 2] and tribal ethnicity ranges of both study samples. An assumption which can be supported by other similar studies: The Meiktila Eye Study in Rural Myanmar [49] and the “older White population study"[50] of Fotedar et al. OAL measurements decrease with age,[41] so the highest OAL is seen in younger adult groups (18–30 year) in contrary to old age group, as the lowest OAL value belongs to older age population of more than 70 years of age, a conclusion that supports the concept of older people move towards hyperopia by getting a decrease in their OAL when they get older.[10]

Males in all groups had longer OAL than females [Figure 3], which trigger on the fact that males have bigger anatomical features and statues, as compared to their national female communities. Scientifically, this can be well explained by the normal biological feminine and masculine difference of facial and body features on the bases of sexual dimorphism in anthropometric measurements.[50],[51],[52],[53],[54]

In the Arab group, OAL differs slightly among the subgroups. “Other Arabs group” subdivision had the longest axial length (23.16 mm) within the whole Arabic origin groups followed by Ga'alin group (23.13 mm), whereas Guhayna group had the smallest axial length (23.00 mm) within these Arabic origin groups. The difference between the three Arab origins subgroups was not so significant [Table 2] and [Figure 5].

The African origin group (23.15 mm) had slightly bigger OAL than the Arab origin group (23.09 mm). Bejja group had the smallest axial length (22.85 mm) [Table 2], [Figure 4] and [Figure 5].

In the main Sudanese tribal divisions, the Western African group had the longest OAL (23.29 mm), followed by the non-Arab races of Darfur (23.26) and then the Nubian groups in the far north of Sudan (23.23 mm). This result goes to some extent with other African studies which show longer African OAL (Eghosasere Lyamu; 2012) reported longer OAL in Nigerian adults (23.50 ± 0.70 mm).[13]

The Nubians of south Kordufan had the smallest OAL (22.92 mm) unlike other African origin groups; these measurements were almost similar to the Bijja tribes OAL (22.85 mm). A fact needs to be studied anthropologically; it highlights the historical hypothesis of late Sir MacMichael [38] who postulated the migration of the The Nubians of South Kordufan back in history from the land of Nuba in North Sudan, a land where Bijja tribe partially used to be part of its inhabitant with some possibility of racial intermix between the two groups. This dialogic point can explain why The Nubians of south Kordufan and Bijja had these low OAL readings apart from other Sudanese population and other Africans (22.93, 22.85 mm). However, it may support Duke-Elder [27] (1949) assumption in some part that Africans are more prone to hyperopia [Table 2]; possible Duke-Elder data collection was from North African countries (Nubians and North Sudan). On the other hand, the longer OAL which is towards mild degrees of myopia will contradict with the late Duke-Elder survey, as we found that in the Africans groups, e.g. Western African group (23.29 mm), non-Arabs of Darfur (23.26 mm) and Nigerian adults (23.50 mm; Eghosasere Lyamu (2012); all they had loner OAL.[13]

The overall average of the OAL in the studied adult Sudanese population was computed to be 23.09 mm, ranging from 18.13 to 29.09 mm coinciding with the average OAL of Arab origin groups.

The mean OAL measurements in normal some Asians and Western populations were found to be variable; the smallest reported OAL reported in Central Rural India was found to be the smallest as 22.60 mm; and the largest was the Australians OAL measurements (25.53 mm). The Sudanese average OAL being the third smallest (23.09 mm) after Central Rural India out of 15 different Nations, going towards some Asian populations like Myanmar, Iran, Jordan [16] and Mongolia [Table 3] and [Figure 6]. Koreans,[55] Singaporean [16] and Chinese [56] were in the middle of whole world populations. The average OAL measurements in normal Egyptian were found by Abdelaziz and Mousa (Cairo University, 2014) to be 23.7 mm (21–30.6 mm),[57] the third biggest [Table 3]. Denmark mean OAL was found to be 23.47 mm (23.74 males, 23.20 females),[16] in Southern Norway the average OAL was 23.5 ± 0.9 mm.[58] Nagra et al. (Birmingham, UK) found a higher OAL of 24.51 mm ± 1.47.[59] Among the Asians, Arabs, and Western contraries, females recorded the lost OAL as comparison to our study.
Table 3: Average ocular axial length in different international nations

Click here to view
Figure 6: Average ocular axial length in different international nations

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


OAL in Sudanese adults was found to be statistically different between males and females. It was of great difference amongst the various Sudanese tribes.

Recommendation

OAL study in pediatrics would be complementary to this study to report the full spectrum of Sudanese population OAL Norms. OAL measurement is a necessary requirement before cataract surgery, thus bilateral measurement should be done imperatively. IOL suppliers can put in mind these racial variation points. Encourage public and academic institutions to work for “Sudanese Records of Norms.”

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Bellan L. The evolution of cataract surgery: The most common eye procedure in older adults. Geriatr Aging 2008;11:328-32.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Trikha S, Turnbull AM, Morris RJ, Anderson DF, Hossain P. The journey to femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: New beginnings or a false dawn? Eye (Lond) 2013;27:461-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Donaldson KE, Braga-Mele R, Cabot F, Davidson R, Dhaliwal DK, Hamilton R, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:1753-63.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Addisu Z, Solomon B. Patients' preoperative expectation and outcome of cataract surgery at jimma university specialized hospital - department of ophthalmology. Ethiop J Health Sci 2011;21:47-55.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Roy A, Kar M, Mandal D, Ray RS, Kar C. Variation of axial ocular dimensions with age, sex, height, BMI-and their relation to refractive status. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:AC01-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Iyamu E, Iyamu JE, Amadasun G. Central corneal thickness and axial length in an adult Nigerian population. J Optom 2013;6:154-60.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hitzenberger CK. Optical measurement of the axial eye length by laser Doppler interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:616-24.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:13-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bai QH, Wang JL, Wang QQ, Yan QC, Zang JS. The measurement of anterior chamber depth and axial length with the IOL Master compared with contact ultrasonic axial scan. Int J Ophthalmol 2008;1:151-154.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bhardwaj V, Rajeshbhai GP. Axial length, anterior chamber depth - A study in different age groups and refractive errors. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2211-2.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Nahum Y, Spierer A. Ocular features of Marfan syndrome: Diagnosis and management. Isr Med Assoc J 2008;10:179-81.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wilson ME, Trivedi RH. Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2012;26:13-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahinia T, et al. The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud, Iran. BMC Ophthalmol 2012;12:50.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shrestha S, Kaini KR, Basnet B. Gender differences in ocular biometry among cataract patients of Western Nepal. Am J Public Health Res 2015;3:31-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Education, socioeconomic status, and ocular dimensions in Chinese adults: The Tanjong Pagar Survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:963-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Meng W, Butterworth J, Malecaze F, Calvas P. Axial length of myopia: A review of current research. Ophthalmologica 2011;225:127-34.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wilson LB, Quinn GE, Ying GS, Francis EL, Schmid G, Lam A, et al. The relation of axial length and intraocular pressure fluctuations in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1778-84.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Jivrajka R, Shammas MC, Boenzi T, Swearingen M, Shammas HJ. Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:289-94.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cheng CY, Schache M, Ikram MK, Young TL, Guggenheim JA, Vitart V, et al. Nine loci for ocular axial length identified through genome-wide association studies, including shared loci with refractive error. Am J Hum Genet 2013;93:264-77.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Atchison DA, Markwell EL, Kasthurirangan S, Pope JM, Smith G, Swann PG. Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. J Vis 2008;8:29.1-20.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Sheard R. Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 2014;28:118-25.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Uhlhorn SR, Borja D, Manns F, Parel JM. Refractive index measurement of the isolated crystalline lens using optical coherence tomography. Vision Res 2008;48:2732-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Moffat BA, Atchison DA, Pope JM. Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro. Vision Res 2002;42:1683-93.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Eleftheriadis H. IOLMaster biometry: Refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:960-3.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Faria-Ribeiro M, Lopes-Ferreira D, López-Gil N, Jorge J, González-Méijome JM. Errors associated with IOLMaster biometry as a function of internal ocular dimensions. J Optom 2014;7:75-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Akduman EI, Nacke RE, Leiva PM, Akduman L. Accuracy of ocular axial length measurement with MRI. Ophthalmologica 2008;222:397-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Saleem M. Review and Modified Classification of Sudan Tribes; 29 May, 2015.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Report from the Embassy of the Republic of the Sudan, Washington, DC, Embassy. Press © Copyright.sudanembacy.org.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
MacMichael HM. A History of the Sudan and Some Account of the People Who Proceeded them and the Inhabiting. Darfur: Frank Cass and CO. Ltd., London WCI, Cambridge University Press and Thomas Nelson Ltd.; 1967. [1-2, 2d Impression 1967].  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
MacMichael HM. The Tribes of Northern and Central Kordofan, Arabic Translation by Saifeldin Abdelmagid. 1st ed. Omdurman, Sudan: Copyright of Abdel-Karim Mirghani Cultural Centre; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Hasan FY. The Arabs and the Sudan; From the Seventh to the Early Sixteenth Century. 3rd ed. Khartoum University Press; 1973.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Fadlalla M, Saleem M. Character of the Normal Anterior Chamber Angle in Sudanese Adults; 2008-2009; Clinical MD Thesis Submitted for SMSB; Council of Ophthalmology; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Hadra Al Sideq (1798-1918), Hadra M. Mahgoub. (1009). History of Arabs & Roots. Vol. 2. Genealogy & History of Hashemite & Arabic Bedouin. Sudan Coining Press Ltd.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Shogair N. Geography & History of Sudan; Dar Athagafa. 2nd ed. Beruit; 1972.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
A'rkal AJ. Transilated by Osman A. Abdraheem. Origin of Funj; Sudan Notes and Records (1932-1946). 1st ed. Azza Publishing & Distribution House; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Ishag I. Migration of Helaleen from Arabic Island to South Africa & Sudan. 1st ed. Khartoum, Sudan: Sudan Culture & King Faisal Research & Study Centre; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Albasheer IA. All of You. 1st ed., Sec. 1. Sudan: Dar Azza Press, Study in Sudan Ethnicity; Husynea & Haseenya Ashraf; Azza Publishing & Distribution House; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez LD, Murray CJ, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age Standardization of Rates: A New Who Standard. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No. 31;EIP/GPE/EBD. World Health Organization; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Davson H. The Eye, Physiology; Visual Optics and Optical Science. Vol. 4. New York, London: Academic Press Inc. 1962. p. 143.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Basmak H, Yildirim N, Topbas S, Ozer A, Erol N, Gursoy H, Sahin A. Pediatric Ophthalmology/Eye and Disorders, Complementary Pediatrics. Özdemir Ö, editor. InTech., 2012. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/complementarypediatrics/pediatric-ophthalmology-eye-and-disorders.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Obgeide OU, Omoti AE. Ocular volume determination in Nigerians. PJMS 2008;24.[The Lim KJ article appears in the references of this article; as reference No. (15)].  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Stone RA, Quinn GE, Francis EL, Ying GS, Flitcroft DI, Parekh P, et al. Diurnal axial length fluctuations in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:63-70.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Tosini G, Iuvone PM, McMahon DG. The Retina and Circadian Rhythms. New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014. [Photoreceptor p 27), (Melatonin p 49),87 (RPE p 95].  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Sihota R, Saxena R, Gogoi M, Sood A, Gulati V, Pandey RM. A comparison of the circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure in primary phronic angle closure glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:243-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
45.
Loving RT, Kripke DF, Glazner LK. Circadian rhythms in the human pupil and eyelid. Am J Physiol 1996;271 (2 Pt 2):R320-4.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Du C, Wang J, Cui L, Shen M, Yuan Y. Vertical and horizontal corneal epithelial thickness profiles determined by ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Cornea 2012;31:1036-43.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Harper CL, Boulton ME, Bennett D, Marcyniuk B, Jarvis-Evans JH, Tullo AB, et al. Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:1068-72.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Nangia V, Jonas JB, Sinha A, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Panda-Jonas S. Ocular axial length and its associations in an adult population of central rural India: The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1360-6.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Warrier S, Wu HM, Newland HS, Muecke J, Selva D, Aung T, et al. Ocular biometry and determinants of refractive error in rural Myanmar: The Meiktila Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1591-4.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, Wong TY, et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology 2010;117:417-23.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Samal A, Subramani V, Marx D. An analysis of sexual dimorphism in the human face. J Vis Commun Image Represent 2007;18:453-63.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Slice DE. Geometric morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol 2007;36:261-81.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Muñoz-Reyes JA, Iglesias-Julios M, Pita M, Turiegano E. Facial features: What women perceive as attractive and what men consider attractive. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132979.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Bruce V, Burton AM, Hanna E, Healey P, Mason O, Coombes A, et al. Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception 1993;22:131-52.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Lim KJ, Hyung SM, Youn DH. Ocular dimensions with aging in normal eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol 1992;6:19-31.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Yin G, Wang YX, Zheng ZY, Yang H, Xu L, Jonas JB; Beijing Eye Study Group. Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: The Beijing eye study. PLoS One 2012;7:e43172.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Abdelaziz A, Mousa A. Ocular axial length measurement using regular ultrasound and IOL master for different refractive errors in Egyptian population. Med J Cairo Univ 2014;82:159-65.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Edvinsen A, Langaas T, Lundmark PO, Gilson SJ, Baraas R. Refractive error, ocular axial length and accommodation in presbyopes living in Southern Norway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:3768.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Nagra M, Gilmartin B, Logan NS. Estimation of ocular volume from axial length. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98:1697-701.  Back to cited text no. 59
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Axial length, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness: Their intercorrelations in black South Africans
Khathutshelo P. Mashige,Olalekan A. Oduntan
African Vision and Eye Health. 2017; 76(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5207    
    Printed160    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal